Researcher of the Month

March 14, 2024

Do parental controls work and what are the pros and cons?

Do parental controls work and what are the pros and cons?

Policymakers and technology companies promote the use of parental control tools to ensure children’s safety in our digital age. In recent years, there has been considerable industry investment in this new generation of technical child protection measures, designed to help parents and carers to control what their children see and do online. Some of these tools operate at the level of the device (such as a phone or tablet). Other tools are embedded into specific services, such as Snapchat, or streaming services such as Netflix. Others work at the level of the operating system, such as IOS, Android or Windows, or are provided by your broadband company.

Control tools vary in functionality. Some allow parents to limit the amount of time that children spend on a device or particular app. Others can track their child’s location. Internet filters block certain categories of content (violence, adult content or gambling, for example), or specific websites. There are other tools that track children’s online activity (search history, online purchases or activity logs, for example) and provide reports or real-time alerts to parents. Some tools track activity and interactions on social media platforms and can limit children’s contact with unknown users.

But how many families actually make use of them, and do they work? Our Researcher of the Month, Dr Mariya Stoilova, and her colleagues, reviewed all available evidence in a recently published study.

Summary

Dr Stoilova and her team, led by Professor Sonia Livingstone, conducted a rapid evidence review of all studies published (in English) between 2010 and 2021 on the subject of age verification and parental controls. 40 studies which met specific criteria for relevance and quality were included in their in depth analysis. Most studies were from North America and Europe, a few from Asia and a small number from elsewhere in the world. The team identified four main motivations for using parental controls: risk aversion and safety, parenting styles and values, child development and parental skills.

They found that parents often use controls to protect children from potential risk, though not all parents are equally worried about safety, and some (about one in five according to EU Kids Online data) are also concerned about the potential negative effects of these tools on children’s privacy, autonomy and decision-making skills. These parents tend to use controls less. Controls are more likely to be used more when children are younger, and in larger families, where children of different ages might be sharing devices and parents wish to have distinct permissions for each child. Parents tend to use controls for additional reassurance when they feel that their child still lacks the skills required to use the internet safely. The research also showed that younger and more digitally skilled parents tend to use control tools more frequently than older parents, or those who are less digitally savvy.

Whilst tools are generally marketed to parents as effective and positive, Dr Stoilova’s findings on their success are quite mixed.

17 studies showed some beneficial outcomes. These were mostly linked to the reduction of online risk, including less exposure to sexual content, cyberbullying, problematic gaming, illegal downloading, self-harm content and harmful advertising. Some tools also encourage positive practices, such as stronger time management skills, improved communication and a better ability to identify when a child needs help. However, other studies found that the controls tools had no effect at all and did not provide the expected protection, whilst some limited potentially beneficial online opportunities. Eight studies actually pointed to adverse or harmful outcomes, where tools led to higher levels of family conflict and distrust, or had negative impacts on children’s privacy and autonomy.

The research highlights that parental controls should not be considered a ‘silver bullet’ which will guarantee online safety. However, when chosen carefully and used to help promote children’s digital agency and development, rather than limit it, they can be helpful as one of many tools that parents can use to help children to thrive in the digital world.

Implications

“The best outcomes for children occur when parents integrate parental controls as part of positive parenting centred on open communication and respectful negotiation within the family.”

Parents looking for further information on different kinds of parental controls should seek resources from evidence-based, reputable organisations that work with children. Dr Stoilova recommends the NSPCCInternet Matters or the Safer Internet Centre as good starting points with robust information about best practices. Tooled Up members can also check out our resource on parental controls.

Choose parental control tools that suit your current needs. Does the tool evolve with your child and allow them to grow? Consider your own individual circumstances and reflect together on what works best for your family. Before use, take time to research that the controls you use protect children’s data. Check how safe the data is and who has access to it.

For younger children (up to the age of 12), it is optimal to use parental controls within the broader context of active interest in your child’s online environment. Consider the risks and the opportunities and talk about both within family life. Show your children that you have a rounded perspective and are aware of both risks and all the ways that they benefit from exploring the digital world.

With teens, support their growing independence through open discussion. Talk to your teen to ensure that any controls you use are age-appropriate and offer protection, whilst enabling their growing agency and capacity to make their own choices. Gradually allow them more freedom and strive to develop a mutually trusting relationship.

Speak to your child about the quality of their online experiences and don’t fixate on ‘screen time’. Screen time per se, is not the problem. Dr Stoilova is currently conducting with colleagues a study on internet use and adolescent mental health (DIORA). One of the early findings is that screen time does not explain mental health problems. It is what your child is doing online that is important. Are they learning, socialising, being playful and creative? Is their experience balanced?

Take a positive interest in the apps and games that your child uses. By talking to your children, you are more likely to know if they are downloading new platforms and content, which might require additional parental controls.

Don’t use parental controls without your child’s knowledge. Some marketing strategies seem to take pride in controls being undetectable to children. The evidence shows that this is counterproductive. As parents, we can’t talk to our children about the things that we know are happening to them online, if they don’t know that we know! Without reflective conversation, children are less likely to learn from the experience.

Think of parental controls as tools to enable children to use the internet safely. Ideally, control tools should encourage children to think about their online activities, help them to learn digital skills and support their growing digitally independence, rather than restrict them from engaging.

You don’t have to use every tool just because they are out there. Building a trusting and supportive relationship with your child will always be the most important step. As a parent, you have lots to offer in teaching your child to think critically, regardless of control tools!

Make decisions with your child, not for your child. Once children are old enough to engage, sit down as a family and discuss your digital values as a group. Explore different options together, share your concerns and explore options that your child is happy to use. Try to make decisions jointly about the best options and tools that might help. In doing so, you will help to avoid conflict. Our resource can help to structure this conversation.

Remember that parental controls are a mixed blessing and shouldn’t be relied on exclusively. Use them as only one of the many tools you have in your digital parenting toolbox. Remember that restricting your child’s use is also likely to restrict their development of skills, learning and communication. Children will need digital skills throughout their life. Strive for a balanced approach which encourages them to use the internet, and to know how to do so safely.

Remember that when children face risks online, they learn, develop and build resilience. When children encounter risk, it doesn’t necessarily mean that they will experience harm. Be realistic about expectations for your child’s digital experience and be balanced in your approach to rules and restrictions.

Finally, don’t put pressure on yourself and remember that there are no perfect solutions. Dr Stoilova notes that choosing what parental controls to use out of the myriad available is overwhelming and the responsibility shouldn’t really all lie with parents. She calls for more support from the industry and better regulation.

Dr Mariya Stoilova

Dr Mariya Stoilova

Post-Doctoral Researcher at the Department of Media and Communications

    Scroll our research gallery

    How Do Young Children’s Relationships with Parents and Teachers Impact Their Adjustment to School?

    Sep 16, 2024

    How Do Young Children’s Relationships with Parents and Teachers Impact Their Adjustment to School?

    We already know that children's relationships with their parents and teachers contribute to their school adjustment and achievement, and that positive, close relationships with adults are really important for a wide variety of children’s outcomes. However, few studies have examined interactions between these relationships or sought to address the nuances of children’s experiences in terms of how different relationships have different impact or influence. To address this, along with colleagues, our new Researcher of the Month, Dr Caoimhe Dempsey, has recently published an article which aims to examine the links between children's relationships with their mothers, fathers and teachers, and three domains of school adjustment: academic achievement, academic self-concept and behavioural adjustment in the classroom. By examining a range of data, the researchers sought to find out whether some children are more susceptible to the effects of the quality of their relationship with their teacher.

    Supporting children's transition to secondary school

    Aug 19, 2024

    Supporting children's transition to secondary school

    Supporting children to successfully transition from primary to secondary or senior school is vitally important. It's a big life change, which can leave both parents and children feeling excited and nervous in equal measure. At Tooled Up, we often use the analogy of a journey for the transitional experience. In fact, anyone who has attended or watched a talk with our founder, Dr Kathy Weston, is likely to have heard her say that we'd all want our children to be well prepared for any journey they go on, and that, as loving parents and carers, we wouldn't dream of sending them off on any journey without the right equipment, mindset and strategies to reach their destination safely and securely. Transition to a new school is no different. Research shows that there are numerous holistic protective factors that can help to ease transition. Conversely, it's also the case that problems with successfully transitioning to secondary school and subsequent lower levels of school connectedness are associated with lower education outcomes, school drop-out, higher levels of depression and anxiety, and increased involvement in criminal, violent and antisocial behaviour. Research also shows that these difficulties may not be equal across different socio-demographic variables, with children from underserved communities (including those from minority ethnic backgrounds and lower socio-economic status) and children with behavioural difficulties facing greater challenges during the transition to secondary school. It's therefore important for all parents and educators to consider how to make this transition as seamless as possible. Along with her co-authors, our Researcher of the Month, Dr Aurelie Lange, has published a new paper which evaluates the efficacy of a new UK-based online intervention called Level Up. In it, Dr Lange seeks to explore families' experiences of facilitators and barriers to engagement and change.

    The impact of digital experiences on teens with mental health vulnerabilities

    Jul 15, 2024

    The impact of digital experiences on teens with mental health vulnerabilities

    Over the last decade, digital developments have led to major changes in the ways that teens learn, work, play and interact with others. Digital access is a daily reality for most children and young people. Nine in 10 children in the UK now own a smartphone by the time they reach the age of 11, and the large majority of children aged 11 now use social media (78%) and have a social media profile (72%), despite being younger than the minimum age requirement for many platforms. By the time teens are 17 years old, 97% will use social media. Coincident with this change, adolescent mental health problems have also increased in prevalence. It is therefore no surprise that much research has focused on the relationship between digital experiences and adolescent mental health. However, comparatively few studies have directly compared the experiences of teens with mental health conditions meaning that some key questions remain unanswered. Do adolescents with pre‐existing mental health conditions differ in terms of why and how they engage with the digital world compared to peers without such difficulties? Are specific mental health conditions linked to different patterns of digital usage? What role do such differences play in the development and escalation of these conditions? In a recent paper, our Researcher of the Month, Dr Kasia Kostyrka-Allchorne, and her colleagues, explore what the evidence shows about the digital experiences of teens with mental health vulnerabilities.

    NELI Preschool: a new oral language enrichment programme for preschools and nurseries

    Jun 13, 2024

    NELI Preschool: a new oral language enrichment programme for preschools and nurseries

    Oral language skills provide the foundation for formal education, yet many children enter school with language weaknesses. Oral language is fundamental to children’s overall development and educational success. It is linked to all higher level cognitive skills and is pivotal for literacy development, and education more generally. It’s also vitally important for children’s social and emotional development. The term oral language refers to a complex set of skills that should ideally work seamlessly together to enable children to communicate with others by producing and understanding language. It’s an umbrella term, encompassing numerous component skills which include having a good vocabulary and the grammatical ability to combine words effectively to convey meaning, along with an understanding of cause and effect, memory skills and the ability to plan what to say and what not to say. Language skills develop rapidly between the ages of 3–6 years making preschool an excellent time to intervene to support language development. Because of this, Dr Gill West and her colleagues – as part of a team headed by Professor Charles Hulme – have developed and evaluated the efficacy of a new language enrichment programme, the Nuffield Early Language Intervention—Preschool (NELI Preschool), which is delivered to children the year before they enter formal education. The programme combines language enrichment for all children, with additional targeted support for those with language needs, potentially narrowing the gap in language skills associated with social disadvantage.

    "More is more”: the impact of careers education on later outcomes

    May 16, 2024

    "More is more”: the impact of careers education on later outcomes

    Does school-based careers education, advice, information and guidance (CEAIG) have any influence on later life outcomes? A body of research has shown that careers education and activities can play an important role in helping young people to prepare for and navigate transitions into the world of work. It has also shown that the quality and quantity of provision can vary considerably, with those who are most socially disadvantaged experiencing the least and lowest quality provision. However, until now, the impact of careers education on later life outcomes has remained unclear. A new paper written by Dr Julie Moote and colleagues seeks to find out what relationship there is between young people’s perceptions of the quality and quantity of school-based careers activities and education experienced at the age of 14–16 and their outcomes several years later, when they are 21–22. Findings are discussed in the light of recent legislation relating to careers support in England, which highlights how important it is to ensure that the needs of all young people transitioning into the workforce and adulthood are met.

    STEM in preschool settings: do teachers’ scientific questions differ by child gender?

    Apr 11, 2024

    STEM in preschool settings: do teachers’ scientific questions differ by child gender?

    In the US, as in numerous countries including the UK, female and non-White students are underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and maths (STEM) fields. A significant body of research demonstrates significant gender disparities in STEM achievement, participation and attitudes from early childhood, and that these continue to widen as children get older. Children are strongly influenced by their early environments and conversations with adults. Whilst gendered messages around STEM are now rarely explicit – children are unlikely to be told that girls can’t be scientists – they may receive more subtle messages about representation and belonging. These differences may contribute to children’s beliefs about their own STEM ability, their performance in STEM activities, and their decision to pursue a career in STEM. US researcher, Dr Sona Kumar, and her colleagues sought to explore whether there are subtle differences in the messages that preschool educators send girls and boys about STEM. Previous, older research with caregivers found that parents tended to provide more scientific explanations to boys than to girls. Studies have also found that, within classroom settings, boys often receive more attention from teachers on science-related subjects than girls. Dr Kumar predicted that teachers would direct more scientific questions to boys than girls and tested this by observing a preschool setting.

    BMI, body dissatisfaction and depression: positive steps forward

    Feb 09, 2024

    BMI, body dissatisfaction and depression: positive steps forward

    We know that more adolescents are experiencing depressive symptoms than in the past, but we don’t yet know precisely why. Noting a need to understand modifiable risk factors for depression, which could inform future preventative work, our researcher of the month, Dr Francesca Solmi, and her team, have recently published new and novel findings about the impact of high BMI and body dissatisfaction on children’s later mental health. They “found strong longitudinal evidence that a high BMI in childhood is linked with an increased risk of depressive symptoms multiple years later” and discovered that body dissatisfaction accounts for a significant proportion of this link, finding strong evidence that being unhappy with one’s appearance at the age of 11 is linked with increased depressive symptoms during the teen years.

    New study links energy drinks to mental health problems in young people

    Jan 15, 2024

    New study links energy drinks to mental health problems in young people

    We’ve all seen the vast array of colourful cans and bottles in the supermarket. Perhaps you are a fan yourself. But did you know that, in 2020, the energy drinks market was worth $45.8 billion globally? It is a large and expanding market, projected to grow at an annual rate of 8.2%, and reach a whopping $108.40 billion by 2031. Despite the fact that these products typically contain very high levels of both caffeine and sugar, and warnings on labels that they are ‘not recommended for children’, they are extremely popular with young people. In fact, if you have offspring of a certain age, you are likely aware that 2023 was the year of Prime, a product popularised on social media. Initially, Prime was a hydration drink, but the range has since expanded to include an energy drink containing caffeine. It became so popular among teens that bottles were spotted selling for £18 in some shops (and more on resale sites), despite the recommended retail price being only £2.99. Research from a few years ago had already found that up to a third of children in the UK consume caffeinated energy drinks on a weekly basis and ranked young people in the UK as the biggest consumers of energy drinks in Europe for their age group. 13% identified as high chronic consumers – having energy drinks four to five times a week, or more. Published today (15th January), the most comprehensive evidence review to date has found that consuming energy drinks is associated with a wide range of risks, including increased risk of mental health issues among children and young people. Our researcher of the month, Professor Amelia Lake, along with co-author Dr Shelina Visram and the rest of the team at FUSE (the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health) at Teesside University and Newcastle University, examined data from 57 studies of over 1.2 million children and young people from more than 21 countries. The study’s findings build on earlier research and highlight numerous risks associated with energy drinks.

    Mainstreaming the Black Pill: Incels on TikTok

    Dec 11, 2023

    Mainstreaming the Black Pill: Incels on TikTok

    You may well have heard of incels (involuntary celibates). Following several violent attacks associated with the ideology, this subgroup of the ‘manosphere’ has recently received a significant amount of media interest. Once mostly contained on niche men’s forums, incel communities and theories are gaining prominence on mainstream social media platforms. The incels are an online community whose members define themselves by their inability to form or access sexual relationships with women. They believe that society is stratified according to physical attractiveness. Women and attractive men are privileged, and unattractive men (like them) are excluded from sexual or romantic relationships. The ‘black pill’ ideology maintains that unattractive men cannot escape their romantic fate because their unattractiveness is pre-determined by genetic factors. Incels believe that their physical traits are substandard and that they are therefore discriminated against by women based on their physical appearance. Misogynistic incels believe that this social structure has been created by women and encouraged by feminists. They consider women to be privileged, entitled, lookist and promiscuous, and believe that women always choose the most physically attractive men and exclude those who are less attractive, using pseudoscience and evolutionary psychology to reinforce their claims. Whilst previous research considerably enhanced our understanding of the incel phenomenon and their presence on Reddit and secluded incel forums, incel’s presence on mainstream social media platforms is understudied and their presence on TikTok is yet to be addressed. Our Researcher of the Month, Anda Solea, is hoping to fill this research gap and has recently co-authored a paper on the incel subculture on TikTok. It examines the presence and spread of misogynistic narratives linked to incels on TikTok and YouTube aims to identify the mechanisms that drive engagement to such content.

    What are the Benefits of Outdoor Learning?

    Nov 21, 2023

    What are the Benefits of Outdoor Learning?

    There is now a significant body of research which indicates that nature is linked to physical, cognitive and emotional benefits for children. In fact, amongst other positive outcomes, nature exposure has been linked to improved affect and cognition, prosocial and self regulated behaviour, better performance in school tests, improved mood, confidence and social skills, reduced ADHD symptoms, lower physiological stress and better physical development and health. It’s even associated with creativity! Much of the existing research into the impact of nature on children does not focus on school settings. Many papers consider specific schemes such as Forest School, which differ significantly in both curriculum content and approach to the kinds of learning that children tend to do indoors. This creates challenges in using it to inform practice in schools. Our Researcher of the Month, PhD student Gemma Goldenberg, aims to address this problem. She hypothesises that if exposure to nature can improve cognition, physical health, social behaviour and wellbeing, then spending more of the school day learning outside in natural settings could have a significant positive impact on pupils’ attainment and mental health. She has carried out some exciting work within primary schools and has designed her project to help schools develop effective learning environments and interventions, and a research informed approach to outdoor learning.

    Schools and businesses

    Let's get started

    Get in touch